Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

When does imagined contact reduce prejudice? No evidence that in-group identification moderates the imagined contact effect

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

Abstract

Imagined contact has been argued to reduce prejudice. Although extant research supports this argument, replication attempts have been unsuccessful. To resolve conflicting evidence from previous studies, this study examined the effect of imagined contact on explicit and implicit prejudice against Kurds and Syrians in Turkey. Using data from 335 Turkish undergraduate students, the moderating role of ethnic and national identification in the imagined contact effect was tested. Results indicated that imagined contact did not reduce prejudice, and in-group identification did not have a moderating effect, even after controlling for actual contact. These findings call for a theoretical refinement to the imagined contact hypothesis and emphasize the need for further research to advance our understanding of when imagined contact works.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)254-266
Number of pages13
JournalSocial Psychology
Volume51
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2020
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • NLA
  • in-group identification
  • prejudice
  • imagined contact

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'When does imagined contact reduce prejudice? No evidence that in-group identification moderates the imagined contact effect'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this