When ecosystems and their services are not co-located: oceans and coasts

E.G. Drakou (Corresponding Author), Linwood Pendleton, Micah Effron, Jane Carter Ingram, Lida Teneva

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Local, regional, and global policies to manage protect and restore our oceans and coasts call for the inclusion of ecosystem services (ES) in policy-relevant research. Marine and coastal ES and the associated benefits to humans are usually assessed, quantified, and mapped at the ecosystem level to inform policy and decision-making. Yet those benefits may reach humans beyond the provisioning ecosystem, at the regional or even global level. Current efforts to map ES generated by a single ecosystem rarely consider the distribution of benefits beyond the ecosystem itself, especially at the regional or global level. In this article, we elaborate on the concept of “extra-local” ES to refer to those ES generating benefits that are enjoyed far from the providing ecosystem, focusing on the marine environment. We emphasize the spatial dimension of the different components of the ES provision framework and apply the proposed conceptual framework to food provision and climate regulation ES provided by marine and coastal ecosystems. We present the different extents of the mapping outputs generated by the ecosystem-based vs. the extra-local mapping approach and discuss practical and conceptual challenges of the approach. Lack of relevant ES mapping methodologies and lack of data appeared to be the most crucial bottlenecks in applying the extra-local approach for marine and coastal ES. We urge for more applications of the proposed framework that can improve marine and coastal ES assessments help fill in data gaps and generate more robust data. Such assessments could better inform marine and coastal policies, especially those linked to equal attribution of benefits, compensation schemes and poverty alleviation.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1531
Number of pages1539
JournalICES Journal of Marine Science
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Mar 2017
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

ecosystem service
ecosystem
coast
ocean
marine ecosystem
services
poverty alleviation
service provision
conceptual framework
policy making
marine environment
decision making
food
methodology
coastal ecosystem
climate

Keywords

  • ITC-ISI-JOURNAL-ARTICLE
  • ITC-GREEN

Cite this

Drakou, E.G. ; Pendleton, Linwood ; Effron, Micah ; Ingram, Jane Carter ; Teneva, Lida. / When ecosystems and their services are not co-located: oceans and coasts. In: ICES Journal of Marine Science. 2017 ; pp. 1531.
@article{444dcfcc098c410386699a8b1ff41383,
title = "When ecosystems and their services are not co-located: oceans and coasts",
abstract = "Local, regional, and global policies to manage protect and restore our oceans and coasts call for the inclusion of ecosystem services (ES) in policy-relevant research. Marine and coastal ES and the associated benefits to humans are usually assessed, quantified, and mapped at the ecosystem level to inform policy and decision-making. Yet those benefits may reach humans beyond the provisioning ecosystem, at the regional or even global level. Current efforts to map ES generated by a single ecosystem rarely consider the distribution of benefits beyond the ecosystem itself, especially at the regional or global level. In this article, we elaborate on the concept of “extra-local” ES to refer to those ES generating benefits that are enjoyed far from the providing ecosystem, focusing on the marine environment. We emphasize the spatial dimension of the different components of the ES provision framework and apply the proposed conceptual framework to food provision and climate regulation ES provided by marine and coastal ecosystems. We present the different extents of the mapping outputs generated by the ecosystem-based vs. the extra-local mapping approach and discuss practical and conceptual challenges of the approach. Lack of relevant ES mapping methodologies and lack of data appeared to be the most crucial bottlenecks in applying the extra-local approach for marine and coastal ES. We urge for more applications of the proposed framework that can improve marine and coastal ES assessments help fill in data gaps and generate more robust data. Such assessments could better inform marine and coastal policies, especially those linked to equal attribution of benefits, compensation schemes and poverty alleviation.",
keywords = "ITC-ISI-JOURNAL-ARTICLE, ITC-GREEN",
author = "E.G. Drakou and Linwood Pendleton and Micah Effron and Ingram, {Jane Carter} and Lida Teneva",
year = "2017",
month = "3",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1093/icesjms/fsx026",
language = "English",
pages = "1531",
journal = "ICES Journal of Marine Science",
issn = "1054-3139",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",

}

When ecosystems and their services are not co-located: oceans and coasts. / Drakou, E.G. (Corresponding Author); Pendleton, Linwood; Effron, Micah; Ingram, Jane Carter; Teneva, Lida.

In: ICES Journal of Marine Science, 15.03.2017, p. 1531.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - When ecosystems and their services are not co-located: oceans and coasts

AU - Drakou, E.G.

AU - Pendleton, Linwood

AU - Effron, Micah

AU - Ingram, Jane Carter

AU - Teneva, Lida

PY - 2017/3/15

Y1 - 2017/3/15

N2 - Local, regional, and global policies to manage protect and restore our oceans and coasts call for the inclusion of ecosystem services (ES) in policy-relevant research. Marine and coastal ES and the associated benefits to humans are usually assessed, quantified, and mapped at the ecosystem level to inform policy and decision-making. Yet those benefits may reach humans beyond the provisioning ecosystem, at the regional or even global level. Current efforts to map ES generated by a single ecosystem rarely consider the distribution of benefits beyond the ecosystem itself, especially at the regional or global level. In this article, we elaborate on the concept of “extra-local” ES to refer to those ES generating benefits that are enjoyed far from the providing ecosystem, focusing on the marine environment. We emphasize the spatial dimension of the different components of the ES provision framework and apply the proposed conceptual framework to food provision and climate regulation ES provided by marine and coastal ecosystems. We present the different extents of the mapping outputs generated by the ecosystem-based vs. the extra-local mapping approach and discuss practical and conceptual challenges of the approach. Lack of relevant ES mapping methodologies and lack of data appeared to be the most crucial bottlenecks in applying the extra-local approach for marine and coastal ES. We urge for more applications of the proposed framework that can improve marine and coastal ES assessments help fill in data gaps and generate more robust data. Such assessments could better inform marine and coastal policies, especially those linked to equal attribution of benefits, compensation schemes and poverty alleviation.

AB - Local, regional, and global policies to manage protect and restore our oceans and coasts call for the inclusion of ecosystem services (ES) in policy-relevant research. Marine and coastal ES and the associated benefits to humans are usually assessed, quantified, and mapped at the ecosystem level to inform policy and decision-making. Yet those benefits may reach humans beyond the provisioning ecosystem, at the regional or even global level. Current efforts to map ES generated by a single ecosystem rarely consider the distribution of benefits beyond the ecosystem itself, especially at the regional or global level. In this article, we elaborate on the concept of “extra-local” ES to refer to those ES generating benefits that are enjoyed far from the providing ecosystem, focusing on the marine environment. We emphasize the spatial dimension of the different components of the ES provision framework and apply the proposed conceptual framework to food provision and climate regulation ES provided by marine and coastal ecosystems. We present the different extents of the mapping outputs generated by the ecosystem-based vs. the extra-local mapping approach and discuss practical and conceptual challenges of the approach. Lack of relevant ES mapping methodologies and lack of data appeared to be the most crucial bottlenecks in applying the extra-local approach for marine and coastal ES. We urge for more applications of the proposed framework that can improve marine and coastal ES assessments help fill in data gaps and generate more robust data. Such assessments could better inform marine and coastal policies, especially those linked to equal attribution of benefits, compensation schemes and poverty alleviation.

KW - ITC-ISI-JOURNAL-ARTICLE

KW - ITC-GREEN

UR - https://ezproxy2.utwente.nl/login?url=https://webapps.itc.utwente.nl/library/2017/isi/drakou_whe.pdf

U2 - 10.1093/icesjms/fsx026

DO - 10.1093/icesjms/fsx026

M3 - Article

SP - 1531

JO - ICES Journal of Marine Science

JF - ICES Journal of Marine Science

SN - 1054-3139

ER -