When the difference makes a difference – the regional embeddedness of entrepreneurship

Robert J. Breitenecker, Rainer Harms, Antje Weyh, Daniela Maresch, Sascha Kraus

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Regional determinants of new firm formation are of interest to researchers and policymakers. In the analysis of new firm formation, most studies use econometric approaches that mask intra-unit variations, not recognizing counterbalancing and dilution effects as a result. Recent advances in spatial statistics such as Geographically Weighted Regression (GWR) take local variations into account. However, these approaches operate only on a bivariate level, making it impossible to detect the homogenous parts of the area under examination with regard to a number of relationships between new firm formation and its determinants. Based on a sample of 412 German regions, we apply GWR and subsequent graph-partitioning clustering to identify multi-relationally homogeneous sub-areas. Being that the results suggest a four-cluster solution, ‘one size fits all’ policies and premature unit zoning can be called into question
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)71-93
JournalEntrepreneurship & regional development
Volume29
Issue number1-2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Fingerprint

Embeddedness
Entrepreneurship
New firm formation
Geographically weighted regression
Spatial statistics
Dilution
Zoning
Partitioning
Clustering
Politicians
Econometrics
Graph

Keywords

  • METIS-321951
  • IR-104201

Cite this

Breitenecker, Robert J. ; Harms, Rainer ; Weyh, Antje ; Maresch, Daniela ; Kraus, Sascha. / When the difference makes a difference – the regional embeddedness of entrepreneurship. In: Entrepreneurship & regional development. 2017 ; Vol. 29, No. 1-2. pp. 71-93.
@article{c43e9fc1a9834d33a727b8596c349be7,
title = "When the difference makes a difference – the regional embeddedness of entrepreneurship",
abstract = "Regional determinants of new firm formation are of interest to researchers and policymakers. In the analysis of new firm formation, most studies use econometric approaches that mask intra-unit variations, not recognizing counterbalancing and dilution effects as a result. Recent advances in spatial statistics such as Geographically Weighted Regression (GWR) take local variations into account. However, these approaches operate only on a bivariate level, making it impossible to detect the homogenous parts of the area under examination with regard to a number of relationships between new firm formation and its determinants. Based on a sample of 412 German regions, we apply GWR and subsequent graph-partitioning clustering to identify multi-relationally homogeneous sub-areas. Being that the results suggest a four-cluster solution, ‘one size fits all’ policies and premature unit zoning can be called into question",
keywords = "METIS-321951, IR-104201",
author = "Breitenecker, {Robert J.} and Rainer Harms and Antje Weyh and Daniela Maresch and Sascha Kraus",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1080/08985626.2016.1255432",
language = "English",
volume = "29",
pages = "71--93",
journal = "Entrepreneurship & regional development",
issn = "0898-5626",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "1-2",

}

When the difference makes a difference – the regional embeddedness of entrepreneurship. / Breitenecker, Robert J.; Harms, Rainer; Weyh, Antje; Maresch, Daniela; Kraus, Sascha.

In: Entrepreneurship & regional development, Vol. 29, No. 1-2, 2017, p. 71-93.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - When the difference makes a difference – the regional embeddedness of entrepreneurship

AU - Breitenecker, Robert J.

AU - Harms, Rainer

AU - Weyh, Antje

AU - Maresch, Daniela

AU - Kraus, Sascha

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - Regional determinants of new firm formation are of interest to researchers and policymakers. In the analysis of new firm formation, most studies use econometric approaches that mask intra-unit variations, not recognizing counterbalancing and dilution effects as a result. Recent advances in spatial statistics such as Geographically Weighted Regression (GWR) take local variations into account. However, these approaches operate only on a bivariate level, making it impossible to detect the homogenous parts of the area under examination with regard to a number of relationships between new firm formation and its determinants. Based on a sample of 412 German regions, we apply GWR and subsequent graph-partitioning clustering to identify multi-relationally homogeneous sub-areas. Being that the results suggest a four-cluster solution, ‘one size fits all’ policies and premature unit zoning can be called into question

AB - Regional determinants of new firm formation are of interest to researchers and policymakers. In the analysis of new firm formation, most studies use econometric approaches that mask intra-unit variations, not recognizing counterbalancing and dilution effects as a result. Recent advances in spatial statistics such as Geographically Weighted Regression (GWR) take local variations into account. However, these approaches operate only on a bivariate level, making it impossible to detect the homogenous parts of the area under examination with regard to a number of relationships between new firm formation and its determinants. Based on a sample of 412 German regions, we apply GWR and subsequent graph-partitioning clustering to identify multi-relationally homogeneous sub-areas. Being that the results suggest a four-cluster solution, ‘one size fits all’ policies and premature unit zoning can be called into question

KW - METIS-321951

KW - IR-104201

U2 - 10.1080/08985626.2016.1255432

DO - 10.1080/08985626.2016.1255432

M3 - Article

VL - 29

SP - 71

EP - 93

JO - Entrepreneurship & regional development

JF - Entrepreneurship & regional development

SN - 0898-5626

IS - 1-2

ER -