Who matters to universities? A stakeholder perspective on humanities, arts and social sciences valorisation

Paul Benneworth, Ben W. Jongbloed

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

    137 Citations (Scopus)
    75 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Valorisation is at the centre of many debates on the future of academic research. But valorisation has largely become narrowly understood in terms of universities’ economic contributions through patenting, licensing, spin-off formation and technology transfer. This emergent restrictive definition of universities’ societal impacts is a worrying development, overlooking the potential of universities’ knowledge in the Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences (HASS). Our hypothesis is that HASS disciplines’ disadvantage compared to the hard sciences (lesser policy attention and funding for commercialisation) arises because HASS stakeholders are not sufficiently salient as stakeholders to universities. Using case studies of three policy experiments, we argue that universities’ responsiveness to stakeholders does not evolve simply and functionally but in response to the networks of relationships in which they are situated. This has important implications for how stakeholder research is used in higher education research, and for the design and implementation of policies to improve universities’ societal contributions.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)567-588
    Number of pages22
    JournalHigher education
    Volume59
    Issue number5
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2010

    Keywords

    • Universities
    • Knowledge transfer
    • Knowledge exchange
    • Universities’ societal contribution
    • Social compact
    • Stakeholder theory
    • Knowledge transfer policy

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Who matters to universities? A stakeholder perspective on humanities, arts and social sciences valorisation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this