Why nerve signals should be measured monopolarly

Joost le Feber; Els van Asselt; Ron van Mastrigt

Why nerve signals should be measured monopolarly

Joost le Feber^*, Els van Asselt, Ron van Mastrigt

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Conference article › Academic › peer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A nerve signal, to which white noise was added, and monopolar and bipolar recordings of this signal were simulated. As a measure for nerve activity both signals were integrated (NA_mon and NA_bip). The bipolar signal was rectified before integration. NA_mon appeared to be a linear measure for nerve activity while NA_bip underestimated it at high firing rates. Furthermore NA_mon was less sensitive to noise than NA_bip. It was therefore concluded that the integrated non-rectified monopolar recording of a nerve signal is a better measure for the nerve activity than the integrated rectified bipolar recording.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	357-358
Number of pages	2
Journal	Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology - Proceedings
Issue number	1
Publication status	Published - 1996
Externally published	Yes
Event	Proceedings of the 1996 18th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Part 2 (of 5) - Amsterdam, Neth Duration: 31 Oct 1996 → 3 Nov 1996

Access to Document

Link to publication in Scopus

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Why nerve signals should be measured monopolarly'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this

@article{4b733ce12ac64cc8b754978d8cf1d2a0,

title = "Why nerve signals should be measured monopolarly",

abstract = "A nerve signal, to which white noise was added, and monopolar and bipolar recordings of this signal were simulated. As a measure for nerve activity both signals were integrated (NAmon and NAbip). The bipolar signal was rectified before integration. NAmon appeared to be a linear measure for nerve activity while NAbip underestimated it at high firing rates. Furthermore NAmon was less sensitive to noise than NAbip. It was therefore concluded that the integrated non-rectified monopolar recording of a nerve signal is a better measure for the nerve activity than the integrated rectified bipolar recording.",

author = "{le Feber}, Joost and {van Asselt}, Els and {van Mastrigt}, Ron",

year = "1996",

language = "English",

pages = "357--358",

journal = "Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the Alliance for Engineering in Medicine and Biology ",

issn = "0589-1019",

publisher = "Alliance for Engineering in Medicine and Biology",

number = "1",

note = "Proceedings of the 1996 18th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Part 2 (of 5) ; Conference date: 31-10-1996 Through 03-11-1996",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Why nerve signals should be measured monopolarly

AU - le Feber, Joost

AU - van Asselt, Els

AU - van Mastrigt, Ron

PY - 1996

Y1 - 1996

N2 - A nerve signal, to which white noise was added, and monopolar and bipolar recordings of this signal were simulated. As a measure for nerve activity both signals were integrated (NAmon and NAbip). The bipolar signal was rectified before integration. NAmon appeared to be a linear measure for nerve activity while NAbip underestimated it at high firing rates. Furthermore NAmon was less sensitive to noise than NAbip. It was therefore concluded that the integrated non-rectified monopolar recording of a nerve signal is a better measure for the nerve activity than the integrated rectified bipolar recording.

AB - A nerve signal, to which white noise was added, and monopolar and bipolar recordings of this signal were simulated. As a measure for nerve activity both signals were integrated (NAmon and NAbip). The bipolar signal was rectified before integration. NAmon appeared to be a linear measure for nerve activity while NAbip underestimated it at high firing rates. Furthermore NAmon was less sensitive to noise than NAbip. It was therefore concluded that the integrated non-rectified monopolar recording of a nerve signal is a better measure for the nerve activity than the integrated rectified bipolar recording.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030312245&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Conference article

AN - SCOPUS:0030312245

SP - 357

EP - 358

JO - Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the Alliance for Engineering in Medicine and Biology

JF - Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the Alliance for Engineering in Medicine and Biology

SN - 0589-1019

IS - 1

T2 - Proceedings of the 1996 18th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Part 2 (of 5)

Y2 - 31 October 1996 through 3 November 1996

ER -