Abstract
Stress-tracking technology is becoming widely available and accessible, offering non-invasive ways to monitor and regulate stress. Yet, current stress-tracking technology presents stress scores that lack transparency, informativeness, and nuance. This provocation paper discusses five key issues that the current stress-tracking technology should overcome, involving conceptualization, measurements, transparency, interpretation, and responsibility. Next, we provide three directions to overcome these issues and inform better stress-tracking practices and future research. Future stress technology should improve stress response measurements, use better terminology and data visualizations, and increase user involvement and transparency. We conclude that there is a pressing need for designers and researchers to take greater responsibility in creating stress-tracking technologies that are useful, fair and just, and centered around individuals’ needs.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1-10 |
| Number of pages | 10 |
| Journal | Interacting with computers |
| Volume | 38 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| Early online date | 26 Jul 2025 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Jan 2026 |
Keywords
- UT-Hybrid-D
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Why we should stress about stress scores: issues and directions for wearable stress-tracking technology'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver