Youth subculture and social exclusion

Jan Terpstra

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this article a detailed description is given of the subculture of a group of socially-excluded boys in The Netherlands. The relevance of some classical theories on youth subculture is assessed for understanding the lifestyles of today’s disadvantaged youth, especially in a developed welfare state. The subculture of the boys is not only an adaptation to their disadvantaged position, but is also an autonomous factor in its reproduction. However, whereas in the 1970s, according to Willis, the subculture of resistance prepared the lads for lower-class jobs, nowadays these boys derive their identity, hopes and masculinity mainly from industrial manual jobs of the past. Four factors are distinguished that are relevant to understand the boys’ lifestyle choices: considerations of prestige among the boys, their relations with dominant institutions, the relations between the boys’ age groups and the reactions of relevant adults to the behaviour of the boys.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)83-99
JournalYoung
Volume14
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2006

Fingerprint

subculture
exclusion
Vulnerable Populations
Life Style
Hope
Masculinity
lower class
prestige
Netherlands
welfare state
masculinity
Reproduction
age group
Age Groups
Group

Keywords

  • IR-60073
  • METIS-319792

Cite this

Terpstra, Jan. / Youth subculture and social exclusion. In: Young. 2006 ; Vol. 14, No. 2. pp. 83-99.
@article{c2a0e2829f78462984e61c057f9204a4,
title = "Youth subculture and social exclusion",
abstract = "In this article a detailed description is given of the subculture of a group of socially-excluded boys in The Netherlands. The relevance of some classical theories on youth subculture is assessed for understanding the lifestyles of today’s disadvantaged youth, especially in a developed welfare state. The subculture of the boys is not only an adaptation to their disadvantaged position, but is also an autonomous factor in its reproduction. However, whereas in the 1970s, according to Willis, the subculture of resistance prepared the lads for lower-class jobs, nowadays these boys derive their identity, hopes and masculinity mainly from industrial manual jobs of the past. Four factors are distinguished that are relevant to understand the boys’ lifestyle choices: considerations of prestige among the boys, their relations with dominant institutions, the relations between the boys’ age groups and the reactions of relevant adults to the behaviour of the boys.",
keywords = "IR-60073, METIS-319792",
author = "Jan Terpstra",
year = "2006",
doi = "10.1177/1103308806062734",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
pages = "83--99",
journal = "Young",
issn = "1103-3088",
publisher = "SAGE Publications",
number = "2",

}

Youth subculture and social exclusion. / Terpstra, Jan.

In: Young, Vol. 14, No. 2, 2006, p. 83-99.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Youth subculture and social exclusion

AU - Terpstra, Jan

PY - 2006

Y1 - 2006

N2 - In this article a detailed description is given of the subculture of a group of socially-excluded boys in The Netherlands. The relevance of some classical theories on youth subculture is assessed for understanding the lifestyles of today’s disadvantaged youth, especially in a developed welfare state. The subculture of the boys is not only an adaptation to their disadvantaged position, but is also an autonomous factor in its reproduction. However, whereas in the 1970s, according to Willis, the subculture of resistance prepared the lads for lower-class jobs, nowadays these boys derive their identity, hopes and masculinity mainly from industrial manual jobs of the past. Four factors are distinguished that are relevant to understand the boys’ lifestyle choices: considerations of prestige among the boys, their relations with dominant institutions, the relations between the boys’ age groups and the reactions of relevant adults to the behaviour of the boys.

AB - In this article a detailed description is given of the subculture of a group of socially-excluded boys in The Netherlands. The relevance of some classical theories on youth subculture is assessed for understanding the lifestyles of today’s disadvantaged youth, especially in a developed welfare state. The subculture of the boys is not only an adaptation to their disadvantaged position, but is also an autonomous factor in its reproduction. However, whereas in the 1970s, according to Willis, the subculture of resistance prepared the lads for lower-class jobs, nowadays these boys derive their identity, hopes and masculinity mainly from industrial manual jobs of the past. Four factors are distinguished that are relevant to understand the boys’ lifestyle choices: considerations of prestige among the boys, their relations with dominant institutions, the relations between the boys’ age groups and the reactions of relevant adults to the behaviour of the boys.

KW - IR-60073

KW - METIS-319792

U2 - 10.1177/1103308806062734

DO - 10.1177/1103308806062734

M3 - Article

VL - 14

SP - 83

EP - 99

JO - Young

JF - Young

SN - 1103-3088

IS - 2

ER -